We’re all just vibrations in ten dimensions
Imagine a species of two-dimensional creatures living on a sheet of paper. The creatures can only move in these two directions and can only perceive these two dimensions. If you were to pick up the piece of paper and crumple it, the creases that you create will have added a third dimension to the piece of the paper. But the two-dimensional creatures would still only be able to perceive their two dimensions, as they too would have been crumpled along with their universe. When a crumpled creature tries to cross a crease in the page, they will be prevented from moving forwards in a straight path and shifted sideways by a “mysterious Force” created by the (imperceivable to them) simple change in geometry of the third dimension. They might give it some crazy name like gravity.
I am currently reading a popular-science book (light on the phys. so you can slam it down fast) called Hyperspace by Michio Kaku, which uses the above example as an introduction to string-theory and how current research shows that the forces of nature may be affected by multiple dimensions outside of our perception.
It says that the theory can explain wormholes, black holes, and time travel.
And I thought this book would be a change from the last few books I’ve read which were also Fantasy.
Currently Sucking On: My Saint Jude Medal

Not to pour scorn on this book cos in the end what the fuck do I know about science BUT I often think that scientists are people with overly active imaginations who try to fit theories to real life.
I mean, sure it COULD be that OR it could be a million other things that we can’t even fathom?
My favourite thing is when scientists come up with an impression about how a dinosaur looks and what they eat. How the fuck do they know what it looks like? In a million years time when humans are extinct, whatever comes along after us might find our bones and think that we were covered in fur, doesn’t make it true just cos some scientist said so….
I hate scientists!
Comment by mintox — August 12, 2005 @ 5:22 am
The point with superstring theory is that despite not being possible to verify experimentally, it is able to mathematically account for other theories that are possible to verify. Experimentally validated theories such as Einstein’s Field (describing gravity), Maxwell’s Field (describing electromagnetic force) and Yang-Mills field (describing weak and strong nuclear force) are all perfect outcomes of this theory. If the theory ran against these theories with established results, then it could be discarded. But this is not the case. The more the theory is developed, the more practical correlations to proven theorems arise. It begins to unify concepts that previously conflicted - such as relativity and quantum theory. It’ll make predictions - many outlandish and impossible to prove, but others can be verified - giving no cause to doubt the validity of the other results.
Comment by jamin — August 12, 2005 @ 10:30 am
But you know that there’s always going to be something else that makes up the smallest thing we know about. When will they discover Sub-String Strings?
Comment by The Duke of Deliciousness — August 12, 2005 @ 6:28 pm
Im strongly considering removing the mantle of “most interesting blog” after this entry Ben. Clean up your act son.
Comment by Anonymous — August 12, 2005 @ 8:35 pm
I’m sorry for criticising you. Please add a link to my blog.
Comment by Liam — August 14, 2005 @ 11:32 am